Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
16576 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +16066%
62.08 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Dec 2007
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
320
528
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

1000W
TDP
200W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
Blackwell
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
208 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
Unknown
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy