Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

96GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

132
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16896
Shading Units
-
528
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
8
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
RV560
-
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
Blackwell
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
208 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
Unknown
Die Size
230 mm²

Board Design

1000W
TDP
Unknown
1400 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy