Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI FirePro V9800

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
3520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +331%
11.75 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Sep 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
1600
320
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Volta
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy