Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +30028%
11.75 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Oct 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
16
320
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
31W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
Volta
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy