Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +2092%
11.75 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Sep 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
27
5120
Shading Units
216
320
TMUs
72
128
ROPs
28
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Volta
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy