Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1239MHz vs 1147MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +825%
11.75 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Nov 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
1087 MHz
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
810 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
512
320
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy