Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 576.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 127% (2600MHz vs 1147MHz)
Lower TDP (190W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210
11.75 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +171%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Nov 2023
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
810 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
48
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
3072
320
TMUs
192
128
ROPs
96
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
48
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
190W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
Navi 32
-
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Volta
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy