Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI Radeon X1650

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Nov 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
-
320
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
RV516
-
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy