Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +149%
12.63 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
4480
Shading Units
2816
280
TMUs
176
128
ROPs
64
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Hawaii
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
235W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy