Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
4432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +12530%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2021
NVS
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
70
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
4480
8
TMUs
280
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
GA100
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy