Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 128MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
4448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +13480%
12.63 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Apr 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
70
SM Count
4
4480
Shading Units
32
280
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
47W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G84
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
G84-303-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy