Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +2256%
12.63 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
70
SM Count
27
4480
Shading Units
216
280
TMUs
72
128
ROPs
28
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
171W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT200B
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy