Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
4240 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +1683%
12.63 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Dec 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
70
SM Count
30
4480
Shading Units
240
280
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
204W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT200B
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy