Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +1544%
12.63 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
4480
Shading Units
512
280
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy