Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4240 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +2019%
12.63 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
4480
Shading Units
240
280
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
28
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT200B
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
289W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy