Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1410MHz vs 1072MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +411%
12.63 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 X2
2.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Nov 2013
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1006 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1152
280
TMUs
96
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.73 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.9 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.470 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
102.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GK104
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy