Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1600MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +71%
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V520
7.373 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Dec 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
36
4480
Shading Units
2304
280
TMUs
144
128
ROPs
64
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Navi 12
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 12
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
7 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
826 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy