Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +1722%
12.63 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
0.693 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
May 2013
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4480
Shading Units
384
280
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
8
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.216 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.86 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
692.7 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.86 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GK208
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
GK208-301-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy