Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (2040MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +303%
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
32bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
4480
Shading Units
768
280
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Navi 24
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy