Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs ATI FirePro V3900

NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX +705%
5.027 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Feb 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
480
88
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

125W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Turks
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy