Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 129% (1785MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX +907%
5.027 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Nov 2013
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
20
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Oland
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy