Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (1785MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX +523%
5.027 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
May 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
384
88
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Oland
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy