Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1785MHz vs 1546MHz)
Lower TDP (125W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano +151%
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1247 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
1408
Shading Units
4096
88
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Vega 10
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

125W
TDP
175W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy