Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs NVIDIA RTX A400

NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1785MHz vs 1762MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX +85%
5.027 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Apr 2024
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
727 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
6
1408
Shading Units
768
88
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GA107
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy