Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +5179%
7.603 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
120
144
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

185W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
RV630
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy