Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs ATI Radeon HD 3850

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs ATI Radeon HD 3850

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 53.12GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3850 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +1676%
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3850
0.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Nov 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
830 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
53.12GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
320
144
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.69 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.69 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
427.5 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
RV670
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy