Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 6950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (185W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +237%
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6950
2.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Dec 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
1408
144
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.40 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.253 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
563.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Cayman
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO (215-0807019)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy