Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1855MHz vs 1650MHz)
Lower TDP (125W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +45%
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5500
5.224 TFLOPS
Blender
CMP 40HX +161%
1294
Radeon Pro W5500
495
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Feb 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
1744 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1855 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
1408
144
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.36 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.2 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.45 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.224 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
326.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Navi 14
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XL
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy