Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon RX 590

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon RX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1650MHz vs 1545MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Lower TDP (175W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +6%
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Nov 2018
Mining GPUs
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
1469 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
36
2304
Shading Units
2304
144
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Polaris 30
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Board Design

185W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy