Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon RX 6800

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon RX 6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (185W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon RX 6800 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (2105MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6800 +112%
16.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Oct 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
1700 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
2105 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
60
2304
Shading Units
3840
144
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
96
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
202.1 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
505.2 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.33 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.17 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1010 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Navi 21
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XL (215-121000187)
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

185W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy