Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (1545MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (10GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 50HX +225%
11.07 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Mar 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
560.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1792
192
TMUs
112
80
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
5 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

123.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
22.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
346.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
375W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU102-100-A1
GPU Variant
Orthrus
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy