Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 50HX +1702%
11.07 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
May 2011
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
560.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
5 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

123.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
22.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
346.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
Cayman
TU102-100-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy