Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs ATI FirePro V7800

NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs ATI FirePro V7800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2144 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 50HX +449%
11.07 TFLOPS
FirePro V7800
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
560.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1440
192
TMUs
72
80
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
5 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

123.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
22.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
346.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
Cypress
TU102-100-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy