Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 70HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA CMP 70HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 70HX and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 70HX 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1590MHz vs 1395MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 70HX +275%
10.71 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1188 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
608.3GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
3840
Shading Units
896
120
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
120
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
167.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
10.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
10.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
167.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
TU116
GA104-100-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy