Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+1373%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2012
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
38W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GK107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
