Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +982%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
0.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
368.6 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
G80
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy