CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050
VS
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
NVIDIA Tesla S2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 900W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+288%
3.994 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
VS
Tesla S2050
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GF100
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
900W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216
2
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
3
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla P6
4
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
5
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M
6
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
7
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA L4
8
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
9
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
10
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla P10
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy