Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+721%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2010
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
1024
Shading Units
256
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
142W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GF100
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
