CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
VS
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+268%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
VS
Quadro K3100M
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GK104
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216
2
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
3
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla P6
4
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
5
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA L4
6
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M
7
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
8
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla P4
9
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
10
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy