Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1950MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+31%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2017
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
160bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GP106
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
