Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 73% (1950MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +362%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1600 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GM107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy