Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1950MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +184%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Dec 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1600 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GM107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy