Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +17265%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
12W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
G98
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy