Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1950MHz vs 1733MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 180W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000
+122%
8.873 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Oct 2016
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
1607 MHz
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5X
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
180W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GP104
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
