Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +15446%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Apr 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
4096
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GT216
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy