Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +6725%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Dec 2010
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GF108
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy