CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
VS
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+3534%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
VS
Quadro FX 4800
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GT200B
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
2
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
3
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
4
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
5
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
6
NVIDIA L4 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
7
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
8
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA L40
9
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
10
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy