Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +3534%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GT200B
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy