Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
G71
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy