Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

VS

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 31% (2050MHz vs 1560MHz)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 280.0GB/s)

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 7 months late

More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)

2048 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Data Center GPU Flex 170

16.79 TFLOPS

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +14%

19.17 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Flex 170

VS

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Graphics Card

Aug 2022

Release Date

Mar 2023

Data Center GPU

Generation

Quadro Ada

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz

Base Clock

720 MHz

2050 MHz

Boost Clock

1560 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

20GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

256bit

Memory Bus

160bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

280.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

48

4096

Shading Units

6144

256

TMUs

192

128

ROPs

80

-

Tensor Cores

192

32

RT Cores

48

-

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

16 MB

L2 Cache

48 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

124.8 GPixel/s

524.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

299.5 GTexel/s

33.59 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

19.17 TFLOPS

16.79 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

19.17 TFLOPS

-

FP64 (double)

299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W

TDP

70W

450 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512

GPU Name

AD104

ACM-G10

GPU Variant

-

Generation 12.7

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

5 nm

21.7 billion

Transistors

35.8 billion

406 mm²

Die Size

294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.9

6.6

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

2

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

3

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

4

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

5

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

6

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

7

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla M60

8

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile

9

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

10

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Related News

1

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

2

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

3

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

4

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

5

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

6

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

7

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

8

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

9

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster

10

Preliminary Support for Intel Nova Lake in AIDA64: Identity Remains a Mystery