Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +5896%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
112
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
78W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
G92
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy